December 06, 2005
Dutiful devotees of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly” may have noted that it took exactly three seconds for this whole nomination business to go to our collective head. A few of our colossal readers may recall that, last year, upon being nominated for jack-bone nothing, we made light of the whole awards business. It’s a moronic, subjective waste of time, we sniffed.
Now, however, weÂ’ve become a bunch of self-promoting lamebrains. WeÂ’re like the InternetÂ’s Omorosa. (Except we have better bone structure, and arenÂ’t as mannish.) What a difference a year makes!
All the same, there are certainly limits to our pathetic Weblog Awards egotism. After all, a quick perusal of the current vote tally demonstrates that we’re about as popular as the Orrin Hatch for President campaign—you know, that ill-starred stab at the limelight that yielded about one percent in Iowa. And, unlike Hatch, we can’t complain that our popularity is hampered by any spirit of renegade Mormonism.
To be honest, we look a little bit like a Pop Warner football team taking on the Indianapolis Colts. Or, come to think, a bit like the Houston Texans taking on the Indianapolis Colts.
As such, dear reader, we must again humbly exhort you to plump for us each day. Not, we daresay, so that we shall wind up in the e-victorÂ’s circle, drinking e-milk. Rather, so that we arenÂ’t smacked down like Richard Simmons taking on Attila the Hun. Currently, our vote total is so low it appears as if our own mothers have cast their ballots for Six Meat Buffet.
In the coming days, dear reader, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” shall offer our official endorsements of other Weblog Award finalists. Given our impressive vote total, we’re certain that manifold “webloggers” are waiting with bated breath for our prestigious endorsement. It’s much like David Duke backing your political campaign: Alert the local media!
Many of our longtime readers are undoubtedly wondering “Will coming in dead last in such a contest affect the rapier wit of the crack young staff?” Or words to that effect.
The answer, we are pleased to pronounce, is a definite No. We were unfunny before the Weblog Awards, and weÂ’ve got plenty of time to be unfunny afterward.
In the meantime, weÂ’ll be crafting our magnanimous acceptance speech. Just because weÂ’re about as popular as the Christian Falangist Party doesnÂ’t mean we canÂ’t start polishing up our rhetorical fireworks.
Posted by: Chip at
12:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 489 words, total size 3 kb.
34 queries taking 0.0525 seconds, 101 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








