February 24, 2005
Addlebrained A few days ago,
A few days ago, dear reader, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” complained profusely about the horrendous advertisements that sit atop our lofty “weblog.” These feculent “web-ads,” if you will, are really cramping our style. And—far more importantly—they aren’t brining in much in the way of revenue.
We hate to beat a dead horse, mostly because it accomplishes very little. Unless you count the anaerobic exercise involved. (You can really whale on your glutes if you beat a dead horse correctly.)
In addition to having an aversion to flogging deceased steeds, we also dislike discussing the same topic more than once, mostly because it accomplishes very little. Unless, of course, you count the anaerobic exercise involved. (You can really whale on your pecs if you discuss the same topic more than once.)
Even so, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” feel it is our obligation to excoriate the drooling morons who are responsible for the adverts that appear on our site at the top of your computer screen. (Or at the bottom, if you hold your computer screen upside-down.)
Why, you may be asking yourself, does the crack staff feel so strongly about this? Well, frankly, we had hoped to retire off our advertising revenue, and, as it is right now, we arenÂ’t exactly sitting pretty. In fact, our ads have proved such a bust that we canÂ’t even afford a time-share in Buffalo right now. Off-season.
Indeed, dear reader, things are pretty grim. And as much as weÂ’d love to blame you for not clicking on the links to our sponsors, we simply canÂ’t blame you. Our sponsors are so, in a word, feculent that we canÂ’t hold you collectively responsible.
For instance, dear reader, one of our sponsors for a given day is ineluctably a dubious company known as CafePress.com. This shady outfit appears to make the big bucks—without any Whammies—from marketing a bunch of junky T-shirts, bumper stickers, &c. In short, it’s everything the discriminating shopper does not need.
And yet sometimes it seems as if the CafePress likes to go overboard, and offer potential customers products that are not only useless, they are ridiculous.
For example, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” kindly exhort you to take a gander at this silly bumper sticker, which reads: “Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam.”
First off, we should admit that none of us has taken any Arabic. We’re more into Farsi. Even so, we are relatively certain that “Iraq” is not Arabic for “Vietnam.” In fact, from our cursory “web-browsing,” we have concluded that “Vietnam” is Arabic for “Spiro Agnew.”
Just when you thought the geniuses behind CafePress couldn’t get more obtuse, they up the ante. Take a gander at the following example of thong underwear, which reads “Lesbians Against Bush.”
What a clever double entendre! What undergarment magic!
All we must do is find a lesbian whose dislike of the Republican Party is sufficiently strong for her to wear a piece of clothing no one will see. She also has to enjoy a string up her posterior.
Hmmm. Well, that leaves out our dentist.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Addlebrained
A few days ago, dear reader, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” complained profusely about the horrendous advertisements that sit atop our lofty “weblog.” These feculent “web-ads,” if you will, are really cramping our style. And—far more importantly—they aren’t brining in much in the way of revenue.
We hate to beat a dead horse, mostly because it accomplishes very little. Unless you count the anaerobic exercise involved. (You can really whale on your glutes if you beat a dead horse correctly.)
In addition to having an aversion to flogging deceased steeds, we also dislike discussing the same topic more than once, mostly because it accomplishes very little. Unless, of course, you count the anaerobic exercise involved. (You can really whale on your pecs if you discuss the same topic more than once.)
Even so, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” feel it is our obligation to excoriate the drooling morons who are responsible for the adverts that appear on our site at the top of your computer screen. (Or at the bottom, if you hold your computer screen upside-down.)
Why, you may be asking yourself, does the crack staff feel so strongly about this? Well, frankly, we had hoped to retire off our advertising revenue, and, as it is right now, we arenÂ’t exactly sitting pretty. In fact, our ads have proved such a bust that we canÂ’t even afford a time-share in Buffalo right now. Off-season.
Indeed, dear reader, things are pretty grim. And as much as weÂ’d love to blame you for not clicking on the links to our sponsors, we simply canÂ’t blame you. Our sponsors are so, in a word, feculent that we canÂ’t hold you collectively responsible.
For instance, dear reader, one of our sponsors for a given day is ineluctably a dubious company known as CafePress.com. This shady outfit appears to make the big bucks—without any Whammies—from marketing a bunch of junky T-shirts, bumper stickers, &c. In short, it’s everything the discriminating shopper does not need.
And yet sometimes it seems as if the CafePress likes to go overboard, and offer potential customers products that are not only useless, they are ridiculous.
For example, we, the crack young staff of “The Hatemonger’s Quarterly,” kindly exhort you to take a gander at this silly bumper sticker, which reads: “Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam.”
First off, we should admit that none of us has taken any Arabic. We’re more into Farsi. Even so, we are relatively certain that “Iraq” is not Arabic for “Vietnam.” In fact, from our cursory “web-browsing,” we have concluded that “Vietnam” is Arabic for “Spiro Agnew.”
Just when you thought the geniuses behind CafePress couldn’t get more obtuse, they up the ante. Take a gander at the following example of thong underwear, which reads “Lesbians Against Bush.”
What a clever double entendre! What undergarment magic!
All we must do is find a lesbian whose dislike of the Republican Party is sufficiently strong for her to wear a piece of clothing no one will see. She also has to enjoy a string up her posterior.
Hmmm. Well, that leaves out our dentist.
Posted by: Chip at
12:01 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 536 words, total size 4 kb.
13kb generated in CPU 0.011, elapsed 0.0396 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0328 seconds, 101 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0328 seconds, 101 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








